Diese Seite mit anderen teilen ...

Informationen zum Thema:
Forum:
UKW / TV-DX-Forum
Beiträge im Thema:
4
Erster Beitrag:
vor 4 Monaten, 1 Woche
Letzter Beitrag:
vor 4 Monaten, 1 Woche
Beteiligte Autoren:
Ruud, Nick_G

BW Broadcast RBRX Re-Broadcast Receiver

Startbeitrag von Nick_G am 09.04.2017 18:26

I have bought a new DSP-based tuner, and it is unlike any other I have used before. I had sort of distantly lusted after the BW Broadcast RBRX1, but never thought I'd be able to afford one. Well this has since been superseded by the RBRX Encore. Normally I wouldn't have been able to afford this sort of thing, but I had a bit of a windfall recently and so used the opportunity to snap it up. The device is actually a professional rebroadcasting receiver. Although it is extremely sophisticated with many options buried in menus, it is actually very logical and intuitive to use and I can make adjustments quickly as needed. It has dual DSP-based tuners. I had to buy adapters for the audio cables (it has balanced XLR inputs only) and for the coax plug (it uses a 50 ohm BNC input) but it was easy to set up for monitoring. The receiver is designed to work with the most challenging of reception conditions and rebroadcast your signal at the highest possible quality, so I knew it was going to be ideal for DXing.

Most of the options useful for me are in the PRESETS menu, and I go to the TUNER 1 submenu (this is the tuner I have the aerial hooked up to) where you can tune up and down in 100 kHz steps, adjust the de-emphasis (off/50 uS/75 uS), if filter (auto/fixed - the latter has 15 bandwidths to choose from ranging from 56 kHz to 311 kHz), stereo blend adjustments, stereo improvement with traditional high blend or fmsi (FM stereo improvement) which uses DSP in a similar manner to the Sony XDR-F1HD to kill the extra hiss with many parameters adjustable, soft mute on/off, again with lots of possible adjustments. The fmsi is superior to the Sony XDR-F1HD in that the stereo seems more natural and subtle - on the XDR stereo on very marginal signals seems artificial with artefacts evident The display on the left which gives info about the received signal includes RDS data like PS name, PI code and Radiotext (this doesn't seem to work properly) as well as received signal strength in dBuV, multipath %, modulation %, ultrasonic noise, softmute, high cut, stereo blend, high blend, and fmsi parameters such as low band, 2.2 kHz band, 5 kHz band and high band. In short it makes one of those Revoxes look plain and simple in comparison! Adjustments are made using the central rotary knob, which means that you can use this knob to tune up & down the band, with no muting. Very nice.

The extended coverage down to 65 MHz mentioned in the PDF specifications is actually not included yet but will apparently be added in a future firmware update. I don't know if the DAB and HD options involve extra hardware or whether this will also be included in a firmware update. I would also hope that there will be an option to adjust the tuning steps e.g. 10, 30, 50 or 100 kHz.

For information, the available IF bandwidths available are: 56, 64, 72, 84, 114, 133, 151, 168, 184, 200, 217, 236, 254, 287 and 311 kHz. Very comprehensive and useful!

The receiver has even more flexibility if it is connected to your LAN, but that isn't really practical for my set up. In theory I could set it up to monitor, say 87.6 MHz, and send me an email when a signal is received, so it could be used as a DX warning device! Having said that, it has what I think may be a software glitch as it occasionally reboots itself at random times, so I'm going to try and update the firmware via ethernet hook-up later this week.

For DXing this receiver is a dream machine in every way. With the IF bandwidth set to Auto it isn't as good as the XDR-F1HD at fending off splatter from adjacent signals 100 kHz away, but using the fixed bandwidth of 56 kHz I think it is actually slightly better in this respect. The clarity when receiving weak signals 100 kHz away from strong locals using the 56 kHz filter is again better than the Sony XDR-F1HD with less roughness and distortion apparent. For general tuning around and DXing I use a fixed bandwidth of 114 kHz as this is a good compromise for good audio quality, excellent selectivity, and easy RDS decoding. If you want to use the receiver as an audiophile listening device you can choose the Measure mode, which bypasses all of the DSP and gives you an unmolested clean FM signal at the widest 311 kHz bandwidth. On BBC Radios 3 and 4 in this mode the audio quality is fantastic, with a bit of a different character to the Kenwood L-1000T, but not inferior. Bear in mind however, that using this mode you will get multiplex noise even on empty channels. The 8 presets can all have different setting stored in them so it's almost like having 8 different tuners as they can be set up for different purposes.

So this device is extremely flexible and sophisticated and it shows what can be done with the latest chipset and DSP software. More info on this receiver can be found at the links below:

http://www.bwbroadcast.com/bwbroadcast/rbrx-encore/64/product

http://www.bwbroadcast.com/files/downloads/BWB-RBRXencore.pdf

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSb-jAsbfPw

Manual: http://www.bwbroadcast.com/files/downloads/rbrx%20user%20manual%20v0.26%20rev2a.pdf

PS the receiver has been sent to BW Broadcast as it has an issue where it occasionally reboots itself randomly, so they will look into this. I suspect it is a software bug. Hopefully I should have it back by the end of the month.

Antworten:

Nice to read Nick but is it really worth the extreme high price?
Ruud
Zitat
Nick_G
I have bought a new DSP-based tuner, and it is unlike any other I have used before. I had sort of distantly lusted after the BW Broadcast RBRX1, but never thought I'd be able to afford one. Well this has since been superseded by the RBRX Encore. Normally I wouldn't have been able to afford this sort of thing, but I had a bit of a windfall recently and so used the opportunity to snap it up. The device is actually a professional rebroadcasting receiver. Although it is extremely sophisticated with many options buried in menus, it is actually very logical and intuitive to use and I can make adjustments quickly as needed. It has dual DSP-based tuners. I had to buy adapters for the audio cables (it has balanced XLR inputs only) and for the coax plug (it uses a 50 ohm BNC input) but it was easy to set up for monitoring. The receiver is designed to work with the most challenging of reception conditions and rebroadcast your signal at the highest possible quality, so I knew it was going to be ideal for DXing.

Most of the options useful for me are in the PRESETS menu, and I go to the TUNER 1 submenu (this is the tuner I have the aerial hooked up to) where you can tune up and down in 100 kHz steps, adjust the de-emphasis (off/50 uS/75 uS), if filter (auto/fixed - the latter has 15 bandwidths to choose from ranging from 56 kHz to 311 kHz), stereo blend adjustments, stereo improvement with traditional high blend or fmsi (FM stereo improvement) which uses DSP in a similar manner to the Sony XDR-F1HD to kill the extra hiss with many parameters adjustable, soft mute on/off, again with lots of possible adjustments. The fmsi is superior to the Sony XDR-F1HD in that the stereo seems more natural and subtle - on the XDR stereo on very marginal signals seems artificial with artefacts evident The display on the left which gives info about the received signal includes RDS data like PS name, PI code and Radiotext (this doesn't seem to work properly) as well as received signal strength in dBuV, multipath %, modulation %, ultrasonic noise, softmute, high cut, stereo blend, high blend, and fmsi parameters such as low band, 2.2 kHz band, 5 kHz band and high band. In short it makes one of those Revoxes look plain and simple in comparison! Adjustments are made using the central rotary knob, which means that you can use this knob to tune up & down the band, with no muting. Very nice.

The extended coverage down to 65 MHz mentioned in the PDF specifications is actually not included yet but will apparently be added in a future firmware update. I don't know if the DAB and HD options involve extra hardware or whether this will also be included in a firmware update. I would also hope that there will be an option to adjust the tuning steps e.g. 10, 30, 50 or 100 kHz.

For information, the available IF bandwidths available are: 56, 64, 72, 84, 114, 133, 151, 168, 184, 200, 217, 236, 254, 287 and 311 kHz. Very comprehensive and useful!

The receiver has even more flexibility if it is connected to your LAN, but that isn't really practical for my set up. In theory I could set it up to monitor, say 87.6 MHz, and send me an email when a signal is received, so it could be used as a DX warning device! Having said that, it has what I think may be a software glitch as it occasionally reboots itself at random times, so I'm going to try and update the firmware via ethernet hook-up later this week.

For DXing this receiver is a dream machine in every way. With the IF bandwidth set to Auto it isn't as good as the XDR-F1HD at fending off splatter from adjacent signals 100 kHz away, but using the fixed bandwidth of 56 kHz I think it is actually slightly better in this respect. The clarity when receiving weak signals 100 kHz away from strong locals using the 56 kHz filter is again better than the Sony XDR-F1HD with less roughness and distortion apparent. For general tuning around and DXing I use a fixed bandwidth of 114 kHz as this is a good compromise for good audio quality, excellent selectivity, and easy RDS decoding. If you want to use the receiver as an audiophile listening device you can choose the Measure mode, which bypasses all of the DSP and gives you an unmolested clean FM signal at the widest 311 kHz bandwidth. On BBC Radios 3 and 4 in this mode the audio quality is fantastic, with a bit of a different character to the Kenwood L-1000T, but not inferior. Bear in mind however, that using this mode you will get multiplex noise even on empty channels. The 8 presets can all have different setting stored in them so it's almost like having 8 different tuners as they can be set up for different purposes.

So this device is extremely flexible and sophisticated and it shows what can be done with the latest chipset and DSP software. More info on this receiver can be found at the links below:

http://www.bwbroadcast.com/bwbroadcast/rbrx-encore/64/product

http://www.bwbroadcast.com/files/downloads/BWB-RBRXencore.pdf

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSb-jAsbfPw

Manual: http://www.bwbroadcast.com/files/downloads/rbrx%20user%20manual%20v0.26%20rev2a.pdf

PS the receiver has been sent to BW Broadcast as it has an issue where it occasionally reboots itself randomly, so they will look into this. I suspect it is a software bug. Hopefully I should have it back by the end of the month.


von Ruud - am 10.04.2017 16:51
Hi Ruud.

Well the alternative would be a high-end SDR with computer and lots of hard drive space. Since having a computer set up by the hi-fi system isn't practical, the RBRX Encore seems to be the best option for me. The SDR would be very nice, but again, I just wouldn't have the time to go through hours of the band later on hunting for the more interesting signals. The Encore does have lots of features not seen in a 'normal' tuner which only enhances it's potential as a DX receiver. Plus more features wil be added in future software updates (which I am told will be free). I think of the Encore as like a standalone SDR but without the ability to record chunks of the band. Having that rotary dial to scan through the band (without muting) is very useful too.

As I only contributed about £300 to the cost of the Encore, then for me it was definitely worth it. I do realise that the price puts it out of the reach of most though.

von Nick_G - am 11.04.2017 20:34
Thanks for your explanation Nick and hope to see exiting logs next months :spos:
Ruud.

Zitat
Nick_G
Hi Ruud.

Well the alternative would be a high-end SDR with computer and lots of hard drive space. Since having a computer set up by the hi-fi system isn't practical, the RBRX Encore seems to be the best option for me. The SDR would be very nice, but again, I just wouldn't have the time to go through hours of the band later on hunting for the more interesting signals. The Encore does have lots of features not seen in a 'normal' tuner which only enhances it's potential as a DX receiver. Plus more features wil be added in future software updates (which I am told will be free). I think of the Encore as like a standalone SDR but without the ability to record chunks of the band. Having that rotary dial to scan through the band (without muting) is very useful too.

As I only contributed about £300 to the cost of the Encore, then for me it was definitely worth it. I do realise that the price puts it out of the reach of most though.


von Ruud - am 12.04.2017 17:02
Zur Information:
MySnip.de hat keinen Einfluss auf die Inhalte der Beiträge. Bitte kontaktieren Sie den Administrator des Forums bei Problemen oder Löschforderungen über die Kontaktseite.
Falls die Kontaktaufnahme mit dem Administrator des Forums fehlschlägt, kontaktieren Sie uns bitte über die in unserem Impressum angegebenen Daten.